There is no universal agreement about what we mean by abnormality or disorder. No one element of abnormality is sufficient in and of itself to define or determine abnormality, but the greater the similarity between the given persons behavior and the elements of abnormality described in The World Around Us 1.2 the more likely it is that the person is abnormal or mentally disordered in some way.
Historical Views Of Abnormal Behavior
1. Demonology, Gods and Magic.
2. Hippocrates and his pre-historic medical concepts
3. Early Philosophical Conceptions of consciousness and Mental discovery
4. Later Greek and Roman thought
5. Abnormality during the Middle Ages.
Towards Humanitarian Approaches
During the latter part of the middle
emphasizing the importance of specifically human interest and concerns began- a
movement that can be loosely referred to as “humanism “. Consequently, the
superstitious beliefs that had hindered the understanding and therapeutic
treatment of mental disorders began to be challenged.
The various milestones in this approach
are:
1.
The Resurgence of Scientific
Questioning in Europe
2.
The Establishment of Early
Asylum and Shrines
3.
Humanitarian Reform
CONTEMPORARY VIEWS OF ABNORMAL BEAVIOUR
Great technological discoveries
occurred both home and abroad in the latter years of the nineteenth century.
There are four dimensions in abnormal psychology that spanned the nineteenth
and twentieth century’s and generated powerful influences on our contemporary
perspectives in abnormal behaviour:
i.
Biological discoveries.
ii.
Development of a classification
system for mental disorders.
iii.
The emergence of psychological
causation views and,
iv.
Experimental psychological
research developments.
BIOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES: Establishing the Link between the Brain and
Mental Disorder
The development of physical and mental
diseases took place in this period. An
important biomedical breakthrough which came with the discovery of organic
factors fundamental “general paresis-syphilis of the brain” a severe “mental
illness” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) of those days
general paresis generated paralysis and insanity and normally caused death
within a span of 2-5 years. This scientific discovery is a combined effort of
various scientists and has been researched for about a century.
GENERAL PARESIS AND SYPHILIS:
In 1825 a cure for general paresis was
discovered. ,
when the French physician A. L. J. Bayle talked about general
paresis being a specific type of mental illness. He proved his points with
various accurate descriptions of the symptom pattern and convinced that general
paresis was a distinct mental disorder. Only after some years in 1897 “the Viennese psychiatrist Richard
von Krafft-Ebbing conducted experiments with inoculation of paretic patients
with matter of syphilitic sore.” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) As none of the
patients who underwent this experiment developed secondary symptoms thus came
up to the conclusion that they were previously infected. Eventually leading to
the relationship between general paresis and syphilis.
Ultimately in 1917, “Julius von Wagner-Jauregg,
chief of the psychiatric clinic of the University of Vienna,” (Robert
C.Carson, 2011)
familiarised the treatment for malaria. As malaria is associated with high
fever and thus would kill all the bacteria’s involved. He conducted this
experiment by infecting nine paretic symptoms in three patients and apparent
recovery in the other three. Now, of course there are penicillin’s for the
treatment of malaria syphilis, but the first method ever used for its treatment
was by medical science thinking it to be a mental disorder. Abnormal Psychology
has come a long way through- from superstition to scientific proof giving hopes
in the medical community that organic bases could be found for all the
diseases.
Brain
pathology as a casual factor:
Scientists
in this era began to focus on the “diseased body organs as the cause of
physical ailments” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) and they believed
that this diseased organ to be brain. Various scientists such as Albert von
Haller focused on the importance of brain in mental functions and also studied
the brains of the mentally ill people. Whereas, “Alois Alzheimer and other
investigators established the brain pathology in cerebral arteriosclerosis and
in the senile mental disorders” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) ultimately in the
twentieth century the “organic pathology” underlying the diseases caused by the
presence of toxic substances e.g. led various types of mental retardation and
mental illness were discovered.
The
development of a classification system:
A
scientist named Emil Kraepelin had a major role to play in the biological
viewpoint. “His book does not only deal
with the importance of brain pathology in mental disorder disorders but also
made several related contributions that helped establish this viewpoint” (Robert
C.Carson, 2011)
the main contribution being the system of classification of mental disorder.
Which became the predecessor of today’s DSM-IV-TR. In which he noted that
certain symptom pattern occurs together so that they can be grouped in one
group of mental disorder.
Kraepelin
viewed every type of mental disorder to be different from each other and
thought that the course of each was “predictable” and “predetermined” which can
be seen in the case of measles.
Caution
Views: Establishing the psychological Basis of Mental Disorder.
Regardless
of laying significance on the biological research, the psychological factors
were progressing as well. The first step was taken by the well known
psychologist Sigmund Freud who during the five decades observed, treated and
wrote a “comprehensive theory of psychopathology that emphasized the inner
dynamic of unconscious motive.” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) The means to study and treat patients came to
be known as psychoanalysis. This can be related to hypnosis. “Hypnosis is an
“induced state of relaxation” in which a person is highly open
to suggestions” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) .
Mesmerism:
“Franz Anton Mesmer an Austrian
physician added to the development of “Paracelsus” about the influence of
planets on humans. He believed that the planets had an affected our magnetic
body fluids, the distribution of which determined health or disease.” (Robert
C.Carson, 2011) .
He concluded saying that “all people
possessed magnetic force that could be used to persuade the distribution of the
fluid in other people which effects cure” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) . He practiced his
views in Vienna and several other cities. He opened a clinic in Paris where he
treated all kinds of ailments using animal magnetism. Where he placed them in a
dark room around a tub containing a mixture of various chemicals and iron rods
jotting out and these were applied to the affected areas, following this method
he treated diseases such as hysteria, paralysis. He also demonstrated many
phenomena’s that were later linked with the use of hypnosis. Mesmer was however
forced to leave Paris and his methods were a subject of debate for a long
period of time where two distinct groups were formed.
THE EVOLUTION OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL
RESEARCH TRADITION: Experimental Psychology.
The first experimental psychology
laboratory was set up at the University of Leipzig by William Wundt.
“The Behavioural Perspective- this
perspective runs around a central theme of “the role of learning in human
behaviour.” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) . At first this was
developed through research in a laboratory and not in a clinical practice with
distributed individuals, its implication for explaining and treating
maladaptive behaviour soon became evident”. (Robert C.Carson, 2011)
Classical Conditioning:
Classical Conditioning was discovered by
Ivan Pavlov, when he conducted his experiment with his dog. Classical
Conditioning is “a form of learning in which neutral stimulus is paired
repeatedly with an unconditioned stimulus that naturally elicits an
unconditioned behaviour” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) his experiment was
conducted to see if a response would occur with the presence of an
unconditioned stimulus. The dog initially salivated at the time when the food
was presented along with a bell ringing, later the dog salivated when the bell
was heard but no food presented. Thus we can say that the dog has been
conditioned.
Operant Conditioning:
E.L. Thorndike, B.F Skinner were exploring
another kind of behaviour, where, “The consequence of behaviour influences
Behaviour” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) “Behaviour that
operates on the environment may be instrumental in producing certain outcomes,
and those outcome, in turn determine the likelihood that the behaviour will be
repeated on similar occasions.” (Robert C.Carson, 2011) Here, he talks about
reinforcement and punishment. Where, the good behaviours are rewarded and the
awful one punished. This was initially known as instrumental learning. (Robert
C.Carson, 2011)
No comments:
Post a Comment